The pros and cons of Stolypin's reforms. Analysis of the activities conducted.

Pyotr Stolypin – a talented politician early XX century. His plan belong to reforms aimed at the transformation of Russia into a progressive state. Leading role in this was to play the peasantry. Let us consider what was the nature of change and analyse the pros and cons of Stolypin's reforms.

Background changes

In 1861, there have been first steps toward the individualization of landowning households in Russia. The abolition of serfdom could lead to increased private ownership, but this did not happen.

Government in the late nineteenth century sought to strengthen community structures in the village that prevented the formation of private peasant ownership.

Stolypin offered the option to solve problems. He developed the concept of mixed economy, in which had to develop both public and private forms of farms.

Changes

The Pros and cons of Stolypin's reforms will be considered at a later date, but interested to know what was the change.

Policies insisted on creating a village of a layer of prosperous peasants. He was sure that in this case, the people will cease to think about revolution. Prosperous peasants had become a solid basis for state power.

Stolypin believed that the peasant needs should not be at the expense of the landlords. He planned to destroy the peasant commune to run their programs. Policies did not take into account the fact that the community, farmers have been reliable support, especially during the lean periods.

Recommended

"Knowledge is light and ignorance is darkness": the value, meaning and alternatives

There are some sayings that would seem to need no explanation, such as “teaching & ndash; light and ignorance – darkness”. But some still do not understand their meaning. But not only for such people is written by our article. I...

What was invented by Mendeleev for the army. The history and fate of the invention

D. I. Mendeleev was a brilliant Russian scientist-polymath, who made many important discoveries in various fields of science and technology. Many people know that he is the author of “Fundamentals of chemistry" and the periodic law of chem...

The origin of the Slavs. The influence of different cultures

Slavs (under this name), according to some researchers, appeared in the story only in 6 century ad. However, the language of nationality bears the archaic features of the Indo-European community. This, in turn, suggests that the origin of the Slavs h...

Stolypin wanted out of the community, every farmer was responsible for himself and his family. As lazy and alcoholics to live at the expense of the overall work, Stolypin thus planned to get rid of these vices among the peasants. The politician wanted to turn every peasant into a hardworking owner who can work to provide all their needs.

Start changes

The Pros and cons of the economic reforms of Stolypin - the subject of our consideration. But how was the event?

First there was issued a decree on the output of rural communities. Leaving it, any farmer could secure for themselves a specific plot of land. Thus, by the beginning of 1916 from the community came out to 2.5 million.

The Second focus of the Stolypin reforms (the pros and cons of which, of course, there was) was the resettlement of peasants. Thus the politician has sought to reduce land hunger and settle Siberia. Those who were resettled were given land and benefits. To move you all, without restrictions. The government spent huge sums of money for resettlement.

The First fruits of the resettlement resulted in the increase of the Russian wheat crop. Those who could not adapt to living in Siberian conditions, it was a bit – 12% of farmers who had moved to the East.

Policy

In the course of the Stolypin reforms (pros and cons which was enough) in the country, there has been active growth of agricultural production, has increased the size of the domestic market, increased exports in agriculture. These events not only brought agriculture from the crisis, but also made it the dominant feature of the Russian economy at the time.

The Resettlement of peasants in Siberia have also contributed to economic growth. Acreage expanded, animal developed. Siberia all major indices ahead of the European part of the Russian state.

Negative aspects

Despite the success of Stolypin's reforms could not solve all the problems that exist at the time. Famine and agrarian overpopulation not stopped. Country, as before, was backward in terms of economy, technology and culture. The rate of agricultural growth was slow, if we compare the country with the United States and European countries.

Obstacle to economic development was the low level of literacy in the field of agriculture. The government provided comprehensive assistance to the peasants, increased their cultural and educational level. Agricultural courses were created to help them implement progressive forms of production in the peasant environment.

During the reporting period (1906 to 1913) much has been done to transition to a new stage of economic development.

Analysis of the held events

So, if we talk about the results of the Stolypin reforms, the pros and cons should be considered carefully. Among the advantages is to provide:

• Beginning of the destruction of the communal system. A quarter of all households came from the community.
• Increased grain yield in the transition period 1906-1913.
• The Growth of exports of agricultural products in 2 times.
• The Development of cooperative movement and small-scale relations. There was a system of farm credit. Built the farm, shops, agricultural companies.
• The Resettlement of 3 million families in Siberia.
• The Industrial boom inthe economy of those years. The beginning of the formation of prosperous farms.

Speaking about the pros and cons of the Stolypin land reform, should be said about the faults. They can be considered the following points:

• A Significant part of farms remained in the community.
• Half moved back and joined the ranks of the workers, and beggars and vagrants.
• Hunger 1911-1912 years, covering 30 million people.
• As a result of changes in society, a new wave of discontent directed against former members who managed to get rich.
• Farm Land that belonged to the landlords remained intact.

If we talk in General about the outcome of the Stolypin land reform, the pros and cons, it should be noted that the desire to implement policy in Russia bourgeois relations did not give the expected result.

Conversion was subjected to numerous critics. The politician planned that reforms will be carried out for 15-20 years. But after the sudden tragic death of Stolypin, they stopped and gradually disappeared.