To come or to come: how to spell a word?

To honor many visitors Internet sites, they are interested in not only the personal lives of movie stars, but also literacy problems. "How to write: “come” or “come”?" – this is a question that is often asked by users of the world wide web. Try to understand.

What argument?

From the point of view of elementary logic, no problem in solving this question. Both of these words – verbs in the infinitive form (the infinitive) because to answer the question: “What to do?" the Infinitive – which is what defines a verb in the dictionary. So what could be simpler? Open the dictionary and check: to come or to come?

All modern dictionaries are unanimous: the correct option is “come”. But for some reason, doubt has arisen, and it is this verb causes fierce debate?

We Turn to the classics. The play by A. Pushkin "the Stone guest”, publishing, 1948: “Ask the statue tomorrow to Don Anna to come back later in the evening and be at the door on the clock.» What is it? A luminary of Russian poetry did not know the spelling of the word “come”, and is known for its meticulous Soviet correctors didn't correct the text before printing?

Leo Tolstoy: “we Need to come to the state of the child" (thoughts on religion). “You see, I came, so I could come" (from private correspondence). These texts were also published in the Soviet years. Is it an error?

Listen to the experts

There is no error. For many years the choice between the words “come” or “come” there was no present of uniqueness, and the second option was even preferred.

Recommended

"Knowledge is light and ignorance is darkness": the value, meaning and alternatives

There are some sayings that would seem to need no explanation, such as “teaching & ndash; light and ignorance – darkness”. But some still do not understand their meaning. But not only for such people is written by our article. I...

What was invented by Mendeleev for the army. The history and fate of the invention

D. I. Mendeleev was a brilliant Russian scientist-polymath, who made many important discoveries in various fields of science and technology. Many people know that he is the author of “Fundamentals of chemistry" and the periodic law of chem...

The origin of the Slavs. The influence of different cultures

Slavs (under this name), according to some researchers, appeared in the story only in 6 century ad. However, the language of nationality bears the archaic features of the Indo-European community. This, in turn, suggests that the origin of the Slavs h...

Turning to the luminaries of Russian language living in the past century, you see the following. In the dictionary by Vladimir dal is actually no dilemma: to come or to come? As written in the publication, correct both. In the explanatory dictionary Ephraim and spelling Ozhegova present only the verb “come”. Ushakov find the same version as the primary, but will be considered valid also writing “come” and “pretty”. As for the conjugations of this verb, along with the modern “sure” allowed - with marked “outdated” - and the options “come, come”.

This disparity in spelling can be explained only by a special variety of forms of Russian language and existing traditions. This is linked to a large number of interested in the problem: how - to come or to come? Confronted in old books or other sources with the option “come”, many still consider it correct.

Cheat?

Someone, not to wrestle with the writing, offers to simply replace the controversial verbs their synonyms: to arrive, to come, to come. But, of course, such advice should be regarded only as a joke. Every word carries its own meaning, and replacing it with a synonym may be either inappropriate or unpalatable for a number of performances. We can say “consensus”, but will never use in this situation, the verb "to arrive". In principle, in the expression ‘come out” this alternative embodiment can be used, and the meaning is not affected. But I would like to see the reaction of the young girl, whose lover (especially if he's not military) would have said that requests to arrive on a date...

What if?

Will Not save the situation even the use most similar in meaning to the infinitive “come”. Come, is the perfect form of the verb that points to a specific result: to regain consciousness, to come to a stop. And coming is an imperfect kind, it does not necessarily presuppose the outcome. Coming to stop – does not mean to be there, to come to consciousness – do not have to Wake up.

Maybe you should not cheat? Isn't it better just to remember how to spell? Come, approved in 1956, the rules – at the moment the only valid option,

Population against it!

Interestingly, even a concrete answer to this question does not protect against new doubts and even objections. Why two options - to come or to come - chosen first? To have the same verb without the prefix is “to go”, but “out” or “iti” in the Russian language does not exist. There is “d” and other forms will come, will come. Where is the logic in the choice of the infinitive “come”?

Many people pay attention to the pronunciation of this word. Colloquially, the sound of the “y” is usually lost, often do you hear “pretty” - why not make such a written form?

Some Internet users, not understanding the logic of choice, even consider the option “come” the typical tyranny of some official from the education, taking these rules. Who knows, maybe so. This version is especially interesting, if you look at the year of entry regulations in force. 1956: the country is led by N. Khrushchev. Not only was it customary in those years different discretionary decisions?

Linguists – over!

The choice of the form “come” controversial not only for Amateurs but also for a numberof skilled professionals. Nevertheless, part of linguists considers that this decision is justified. With reference to prutkov (“Behold the root!”), a specialist on the Internet simply offers a detailed analysis of these words. The infinitive “come” and in its various word forms (go, goes, went, etc.) to identify the root very difficult. General a significant part can only be considered “and”, which can be lowered (went, gone) or go to the “y” (to go, to leave). For the old Slavonic language that belongs to the verb “to go”, this situation is not uncommon. Analysis of the word “go” will give us the root “and”, infix “d”, the verbal suffix “T.”. From this point of view, the option “come” quite logical: “when” is a prefix “th” the root and the same suffix.

All want an answer? Even the author trying to tell and prove, how to write “come” how to deal with other forms of this verb still does not forget to refer to the complex linguistic processes and their inexplicable results. Maybe this just the case?

About Russian language

Users of a Network, in the framework of the dispute: “come” or “come”, the spelling of many other words were also questioned. Why, for example, we write «Bolshevik» and at the same time, “stupid”, “taste”, if, logically, all 3 words must have the same suffix? The author of the question tried to argue. Like, option «Bolshevik" derived from "Bolshevism" and not «Bolshevik», and therefore not written by “C” as “outside”. But the answer is not too convincing, because the word «Bolshevik», although present in the dictionary, practice is generally not used. No matter what kind of formative released it went, as the adjective usually applies the second option.

The Word «Bolshevik» and everything associated with it, is no longer relevant, and it is possible not to puzzle over their spelling. But how many in the Russian language, in other words, the writing of which makes thoroughly think!

As to write: “victory” or “winning”? - interested comrades. But nothing! Such words do not exist! For the verb “to win” in the 1st person singular of the future tense simply no forms. Quite suitable options – “win”, “to win”.

“Not logite the mirror on the Desk” version of the classic mistakes that cause conflict in the wonderful film "we'll Live till Monday”. Two common misunderstandings: "lay down” and “poklast”. It is important to remember that the verb "lay down" without the prefixes does not exist. The correct way is “put”. This verb, in turn, also is not used with prefixes; here the faithful can only be the words “put”, “invest” etc.

How to form the imperative mood of the verb “to go”? Well, certainly not “drive” or “head”! “Go”, “come over”, “call” - that the appropriate options.

About borrowed words

If sometimes so difficult to determine the spelling of Russian words, then what about the foreign terms? To abandon their use, as zealous offer a separate head, should not – a more expensive! Which is easier: to say “air” or come up with a new definition such as “air-purifier-cooler"? Too hard!

So, you just need to remember. For example, favorite coffee-espresso, not expresso; fast train and drink a different spelling.

About Lenin's Testament

“to study, Study and study again!” - called once Ulyanov-Lenin and the main Bolshevik Testament do is to accept. Study – this is the only option to make your writing and speech more or less literate. Wherever it turns, you need to get to the bottom. Where does not work – easy to remember. Learn grammar, finally, you to browse dictionaries.

The Internet is sometimes interested in and derived us to parse verbs. I ask, as it is written: “forever” or “come”? This question how to answer awkward - the situation discussed in school lessons. Well, of course, came! The letter “on” after a Sizzling yet possible in the case of the few nouns (weld burn), but in the case of verb endings, it can not be. Here, even the head over the spelling of breaking is not necessary, enough to pick up a textbook and learn the rules.

Why?

But how important is it-to write correctly? After all, without letters of whole Nations and generations, and nothing! Communication on the Internet now reveals glaring ignorance, but it does not prevent people to talk and find a common language. And if they do not find, for reasons political or other differences, but not due to errors in the letter.

To some extent, the conversation about the need for beautiful and to Express their thoughts is pointless. Who feels the need to be literate, he is looking for any opportunity to improve their knowledge and to Supplement the lexicon. Who errors and poor style is not prevent to live in the world, and live on, without listening to any remonstrance.

Hereonly… Educated people mistakes in another letter extremely hurt the eyes, and immediately lost respect for their author. Someone illiterate compares the text with the dirty neck of his owner, for some spelling mistakes akin to stains on the clothes. Does anyone really want to be known as a slut in the eyes of others?